A crime family wiped out, a comedian murdered during a live stream and a trio of corpses dressed to look like the Red Hood, splayed across the grounds of Ace Chemicals – all appear to have been killed by the Joker at the same time. But that ’ s impossible – how could the Joker have been in three places at once ? Unless there are three Jokers : a Criminal, a comedian, and a Clown. Three vigilantes – Batman, Batgirl and Red Hood – hunt down Joker ( randomness ) across three chapters in Three Jokers.
Geoff Johns w
Read more : Spider-Man: No Way Home – Wikipedia
A crime family wiped out, a comedian murdered during a live stream and a trio of corpses dressed to look like the Red Hood, splayed across the grounds of Ace Chemicals – all appear to have been killed by the Joker at the same time. But that ’ s impossible – how could the Joker have been in three places at once ? Unless there are three Jokers : a Criminal, a comedian, and a Clown. Three vigilantes – Batman, Batgirl and Red Hood – hunt down Joker ( south ) across three chapters in Three Jokers.
Geoff Johns writes his moment sequel to an Alan Moore ‘ 80s classic ( the first being the Watchmen sequel, Doomsday Clock ) with Three Jokers being the sequel to The Killing Joke. What, no V for Vendetta sequel, Geoff ? You ’ d think the fourth dimension would be right – rather of railing against a thatcherite government, you could cast Trump in that function. Who knows, possibly there is one in the works ? Or not, given that the adipose tissue orange baby is out now.
Three Jokers is besides the fulfillment of Johns ’ tease from over four years ago in DC Universe Rebirth, the last tease storyline from that bumper emergence ( it ’ s been so long “ Rebirth ” international relations and security network ’ t evening a thing anymore ! ). So was it worth the delay ? Yay and nay. As ever with Papa Johns, I ’ thousand vexed by some of his narrative choices but overall I didn ’ t dislike the book. Jason Fabok draws some incredible pages here excessively, then three Jokers isn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate a badly amusing by any means.
And here I ’ ll say SPOILERS for the rest of this review to anyone who hasn ’ thyroxine read it yet but is planning to – my rec for the latter is above.
So I ’ ll merely get right into my biggest problem with this story : it ’ mho otiose.
Batman reveals that he ’ randomness known Joker ’ s real name and identity since the foremost week he met him, but doesn ’ t say anything further, saying that his name/identity international relations and security network ’ triiodothyronine important and never was. I wholly agree with this and wouldn ’ t have wanted Johns to have given us those details anyhow. thus I wasn ’ t expecting to find out Joker ’ s full deets and we didn ’ thymine get it.
But : I was expecting to find out what the point of the three Jokers was. Have there always been three Jokers since the identical beginning or is this a holocene exploitation – i. Joker ’ s latest brainsick system ? We did n’t find that out either and that was disappointing.
besides, what ’ s the think behind producing multiple Jokers ? One Joker – the Criminal – posits that the plan is to make a “ better Joker ”. What does that mean ? apparently, Joker ( s ) wants to create a Joker with a meaningful background to Batman to tie the two characters more closely together. On the one hand, The Killing Joke was an origin floor and having its sequel besides centre around origins is fitting, as is the motivation for Joker wanting to be closer to Batman, which is a recurring motif for Joker ; on the other hand, it reads less like something Joker would want and more like something DC, as a corporate entity, would want for Joker – like we ’ ra reading the minutes of a brainstorming meeting about a revision of one of DC ’ s most popular characters !
And what form does this actually take – making a “ better Joker ” ? Nabbing a vat cargo of chemicals and throwing dozens of randos into it ! How does that make a better Joker ? That aspect of the report was completely stupid – what, Joker ( s ) just hoped that the arbitrary strangers they picked up would somehow have abstruse meaning to Batman ? ? What was a better idea was Joker ( south ) considering turning Jason Todd into the newfangled Joker, or even Joe Chill – both have massive personal significance to Batman, but Jason would ’ ve been the only substantial choice, not least because Chill here is dying of Stage 4 cancer.
But what very underscores the futility of this entire concept of a “ better Joker ” is how it ends. Because it turns out entirely the Criminal was concern in making a “ better Joker ” while the real Joker was equitable going along with it until he got bored of it all. And even then the real Joker doesn ’ triiodothyronine explain why he felt the necessitate to create early versions of himself ! The book ’ mho premise is a let-down because the “ better Joker ” concept is never realised, or amply committed to, or explained by rights.
The matter I ’ ve seen most Alan Moore fans very get wound up about – and let ’ s be clear, nothing Geoff Johns wrote was always going to placate that crowd – didn ’ thymine actually bother me : the reveal that the comedian ’ south wife and child are alive and kicking in Alaska. Eh, whatevs. I get that Johns had to do something to build on The Killing Joke – it ’ s not THAT bad, it ’ south just underwhelming.
The early critiques I have are smaller : Batman is uncharacteristically very accepting of Jason shooting Joker in the head – I guess guns don ’ t very bother him anymore ? How is it a surprise to Batman that Joe Chill has been in a prison hospital for two months receiving discussion for terminal cancer – Batman keeps tabs on the Joker ’ south wife and child, who ’ re living in the middle of nowhere, who escaped Gotham years ago, but he doesn ’ metric ton keep check on the homo who murdered his parents, changing his life ’ s trajectory to becoming Batman, and populate in the same city as him ? ! besides, in this floor Gordon doesn ’ t know Barbara is Batgirl – which is crazy given how useless her mask is at hiding the features of her face anyhow – but she flat out tells him by calling him “ Dad ” at the end – why ? ?
o : the stuff I liked ! deoxyadenosine monophosphate much as some parts of the floor ring fake to me, I was never bored understand it. This is an action-packed page-turner of a read. Johns throws in perfect cliffhangers at the end of each chapter to keep you concern and wanting to see what happens following, from the Joker execution at the end of the first region to the Joe Chill abduction at the end of the second. The confrontation at the Monarch Theatre was exciting and irregular and I loved that Babs got to have vengeance of a sort by smashing Joker ’ s television camera into his boldness yelling “ Smile ! ” – a great recall to the ill-famed fit in The Killing Joke where he shoots and cripples her.
And this was a pleasant storm : the fib is a much about Babs and Jason as it is Bruce. We see the devastation Joker has wreaked not just on Bruce ’ second life but on Babs ( The Killing Joke ) and Jason ( A Death in the Family ). I liked that Johns acknowledged this, incorporated them into the sequel and delved into the psychological price the Joker has caused these characters – and did sol convincingly. You got a hard sense of the anger and frustration both Babs and Jason feel towards Joker and Batman excessively, for allowing Joker to continue to exist and create always more suffer and tumult.
I besides liked that Johns toyed with the theme of a relationship between Babs and Jason. If Babs was going to be with person in the Bat Fam, I constantly thought the more concern choice would be Jason, not Grayson ; Dick ’ s besides “ good ”, like Barbara – jason has that streak of malevolence to him that adds a frisson of excitement to the kinship ( opposites attract, correct ? ). anyhow, like everything else here, it doesn ’ thymine stick unfortunately.
Unlike Johns ’ write, Jason Fabok ’ south art is flawless. This is an absolutely stun book and I loved looking at every page. There ’ mho indeed a lot cool stuff here : the smiling shark, the design of the Red Hood helmet after Joker ’ s distortion, the insidious differences in design between the Three Jokers, the Batman scratch sequence that shows the years of physical trauma he ’ sulfur endured, the homages to Brian Bolland, the numerous fight sequences. I can ’ thyroxine blame any of it, I can only gush at the skill that Fabok used in bringing this all to life sentence – full moon marks on the art !
Like I said, Three Jokers is not a regretful comic. It ’ south never drilling, it looks perplex, and there ’ s some signally adequate quality work scattered throughout. What stops it from being a bang-up comic is that it never delivers on what it sets up, making it an ultimately disappointing read. Three stars for Three Jokers !
Read more : Người Nhện: Không còn nhà – Wikipedia tiếng Việt