From the dumb film that ‘s the oldest acknowledge theatrical performance adaptation in universe to the latest contemporaneous computer-animated feature film, A Christmas Carol has been presented in a number of different media over the decades. Each genesis has enjoyed its own iteration of the classical narrative, but our stream generation has the unprecedented ability to access each and every one of those adaptations at a caprice. With that in judgment, here are 20 that should be on your watchlist .
A quick note on Bharat Nalluri ‘s The Man Who Invented Christmas. This 2017 addition to the canon of A Christmas Carol takes a different tack in that it follows Dickens himself, played by Dan Stevens, on his travel toward writing and publishing the dateless narrative. Scrooge ( Christopher Plummer ) and the familiar Ghosts of Christmas still make an appearance, but from a skew position that takes quite a few liberties with Dickens ‘ life. In other words, it ‘s a novelize fib about a remarkable writer of fabrication, and one that seems to borrow from the canon than it adds to it. You can read Matt Goldberg ‘s wide revue here.
For our latest accession, FX ‘s A Christmas Carol, from writer Steven Knight ( Peaky Blinders ) and director Nick Murphy ( The Awakening ), you can read my review here before seeing where it falls amongst the early adaptations .
- Scrooge, or, Marley's Ghost
- 21. Scrooge (1970)
- 20. Rich Little's Christmas Carol
- 19. The Stingiest Man in Town
- 18. Mister Magoo's Christmas Special
- 17. Bugs Bunny's Christmas Carol
- 16. A Christmas Carol: The Musical
- 15. Ms. Scrooge
- 14. Christmas Carol: The Movie
- 13. Robert Zemeckis' A Christmas Carol
- 12. FX's 'A Christmas Carol'
- 11. Mickey's Christmas Carol
- 10. A Flintstone's Christmas Carol
- 9. A Christmas Carol (1999)
- 8. A Christmas Carol (1997)
- 7. The Muppet Christmas Carol
- 6. A Christmas Carol (1984)
- 5. Scrooged
- 4. A Christmas Carol (1971)
- 3. Scrooge (1935)
Scrooge, or, Marley’s Ghost
This beginning adaptation is n’t actually included in the rankings since it ‘s such an obscure one, but since it ‘s the oldest known film version adaptation in universe, I had to at least bring it to your attention. Directed by Walter R. Booth and produced by R.W. Paul in 1901, the british short film featured an unidentified actor playing Scrooge. Though merely four minutes and 55 seconds of the six-minute-and-20-seconds-long film are available to curious audiences, at least the 35mm bobbin is preserved by the british Film Institute .
As you can see in the video above ( just stop for a second and think about how cool it is that we have the ability to do that ), Scrooge encounters entirely the ghost of Marley who shows him visions of Christmases past, portray and future. There are some impressive visuals on display for a sour that ‘s about 115 years old, though the presence of a theatrical setup is impregnable throughout. This is a effective a place to start as any, write for reading the original Christmas narrative itself .
COLLIDER VIDEO OF THE DAY
21. Scrooge (1970)
There ‘s reasonably much a version of Scrooge for everyone out there, but five-time Oscar-nominated actor Albert Finney is most decidedly not for me. There ‘s something about his operation that is strange and off-putting. possibly it ‘s his preference for lurching about with a writhe grimace and a hunched back, or the fact that his character ca n’t quite seem to come to grips with the lessons the spirits are trying to teach him. then there ‘s the fact that this is a musical rendition of the fib, and while that may be great for some folks, it ‘s not my stadium of gruel .
That being said, this adaptation does have a few things that others do not. When Scrooge returns dwelling on Christmas Eve, there ‘s a apparitional life-size horse-drawn passenger car that passes through his lobby ; this is a description pulled mighty from Dickens ‘ text that was meant to illustrate just how erectile Scrooge ‘s home truly was. Another matter to note is that we actually see niggard temporarily wear his very own ponderous chain just before his redemptive moment, with Marley stopping by to bid him a not-so-fond farewell and a Merry Christmas. however, Finney ‘s performance is eerily similar to Adam Sandler’s Little Nicky, so it ‘s on the list of A Christmas Carol adaptations I ‘d rather not watch again .
20. Rich Little’s Christmas Carol
Like the version above and those that follow, this take on A Christmas Carol is at least worth a watch if you have n’t seen it before. Despite the fact that Dickens ‘ floor is a dateless narrative, I was a bite surprised to find how date Rich Little’s HBO special was. It’s identical 1978, owing by and large to Little ‘s shtik that relies heavily on celebrity impersonations and topical humor. The musical numbers and laugh track besides add a fleshy hand to the drollery routines .
If you know the names Paul Lynde, W.C. Fields, Peter Falk, and Truman Capote well enough to appreciate Little ‘s impersonations and inside jokes, then you should check this one out. differently, it ‘s probably not worth your prison term. Though Little ‘s one-man express in which he takes on 15 or so function by himself is impressive, I ‘d reserve this one for the nostalgic and the Dickens dedicated .
19. The Stingiest Man in Town
The Rankin/Bass purists among you probably know that the liveliness caller behind such celebrated vacation specials as Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, The Little Drummer Boy, and Frosty the Snowman besides churned out their own take on A Christmas Carol titled The Stingiest Man in Town. If this comes ampere news to you, you might besides be surprised to learn that the special was n’t produced using the claymation-like Animagic, but rather traditional liveliness. The japanese animation studio, Topcraft, that brought this particular to animation besides housed many of the animators that would late start Studio Ghibli .
This animated remake of a democratic live-action melodious extra by the lapp list, which starred Basil Rathbone as Scrooge, featured Tom Bosley as a narrating “ humbug ” and Walter Matthau as the parsimony lender. The tone of this one is much more cartoonish, what with the talking rats, cats, and dogs, and punch-drunk songs. And while the musical numbers are nowhere near american samoa memorable as Rudolph, there ‘s quite a morsel of Dickens ‘ actual dialogue used here. Though it plays up some of the fib ‘s more awful and supernatural elements, the spirits themselves are boundary line farcical. You can pass on this one unless you ‘re filling out your Rankin/Bass lotto card .
18. Mister Magoo’s Christmas Special
If you ‘re a fan of the nearsighted, 1960s Jim Backus -voiced cartoon fictional character Mister Magoo, then this Christmas special should be a slam dunk for your watchlist. If you have no estimate what I ‘m talking about, then this is equitable as easily a “ Pass. ” It ‘s so far another animated adaptation that skews towards a younger crowd with cockamamie songs and less-than-scary spirits, but these days only adults of a certain long time would probably appreciate its spell .
There ‘s an interest root that pops up in a numeral of these animate adaptations that use long-familiar cartoon characters to play Scrooge. Rather than just be Scrooge, many of the specials have a frame story that has the character playing Scrooge in a maneuver of some sort. This allows for some add gags outside of the structure of Dickens ‘ story, but there are better versions than Magoo ‘s. The saving grace here is that Mister Magoo ‘s redemption as Scrooge is quite cunning and literally brings down the house .
17. Bugs Bunny’s Christmas Carol
now here ‘s an animize adaptation of a different classify. Rather than set up some kind of elaborate frame floor, the Merrie Melodies gang just jump right into the narrative. I appreciate that, barely like I appreciate the eight-minute runtime of this short, making it the most economic version since the 1901 silent film in terms of time. however, this is a very loose and airheaded adaptation that ‘s better leave for the little ones to enjoy .
sure, seeing Yosemite Sam blow his smokestack as a harass and harassed Ebenezer Scrooge and listening to Porky Pig bumble as the aflutter Bob Cratchit are capital moments, but if you ‘re looking for a broad adaptation, you should try elsewhere. then again, if you equitable want to see Bugs Bunny play pranks on Yosemite Sam and bring a crowd of his friends in to play cameo, then this is a fun little light to watch during the holidays .
16. A Christmas Carol: The Musical
We ‘ve already featured a feature film, television receiver special, and cartoon adaptations in our list, but this is our first live-action television special that ‘s besides a melodious. And it ‘s not great. surely, the production quality was solid for television, and eight-time Oscar-winning songwriter Alan Menken surely brings home the musical dowry of the proceedings, but the very “ television actor ” cast of Kelsey Grammer, Jason Alexander, Jane Krakowski, Jesse L. Martin, and Jennifer Love Hewitt keep this adaptation from soaring any higher .
Director Arthur Allan Seidelman’s translation of A Christmas Carol broadens the phase beyond the usual settings, in character to include active musical numbers featuring lots of cast and chorale members, but it besides feels just a bite besides clean for victorian London. The concern aspects of this version include Grammer ‘s Scrooge meeting the Christmas Spirits earlier in the picture in their homo forms, a spot of foreshadowing not seen in other adaptations. unfortunately Grammer ‘s redemptive moment does n’t quite bring this one home, even though his niggard does make amends with, apparently, the whole town. If you ‘re a winnow of musicals, you can do worse than checking this one out .
15. Ms. Scrooge
Ms. Scrooge is our first real departure from A Christmas Carol as a traditional adaptation to more of a contemporaneous re-imagining. Oscar-winner John Korty directs the Oscar-nominated Cicely Tyson as, wait for it, Ms. Ebenita Scrooge. nowadays you could easily dismiss this deep 90s television movie as a weird one-off in A Christmas Carol history, but it actually has some brilliant moments, such as a sermon delivered by Scrooge ‘s nephew Reverend Luke ( Michael Beach ) that hammers home the dispute between sinners and saints during their time on Earth .
That being said, the history of Tyson ‘s Scrooge from her traumatic childhood through her detached adulthood and late-in-coming redemption might not be to everyone ‘s like. While the gender and race trade for this version is admirable, there ‘s besides an odd attempt to shoehorn racial tensions and gender inequality in the workplace into the narrative. Those issues are raised but never brought to a satisfactory conclusion, so they fall short, just like Tyson ‘s delivery of Scrooge ‘s redemptive moment at the movie ‘s end. however, a worthy watch if you ‘re looking for an alternative contain on the classic narrative .
14. Christmas Carol: The Movie
The future inspire film on our list is another undertake to embellish Dickens ‘ original narrative and go from the established storyline. In film director Jimmy T. Murakami’s version, supporting characters get a chance to shine on their own preferably than bask in ignite reflected from Scrooge ‘s central storyline. It ‘s an leftover choice that offers a bigger character to Scrooge ‘s former fire Belle ( voiced by Kate Winslet ) and Scrooge ‘s confederate, Old Joe ( Robert Llewellyn ). Scrooge himself ( Simon Callow ) is much younger, which gives him a probability to rekindle his sleep together with Belle once he ‘s found redemption. ( Oh, and I should mention that Nicolas Cage voices Marley, albeit concisely, which should pique your interest. )
In summation to Belle and Old Joe getting strain roles, this adaptation introduces a family of dormouse that act as expressive go-betweens for younger audiences, but they ‘re not the entirely fresh additions. There ‘s besides the well-intentioned Dr. Lambert and the good-natured money-lender Mr. Leach. Oh, and then Winslet sings for some reason. But all of these oddities digression, this version does feature a quite nasty take on Scrooge, as seen when he douses an already ailing Tiny Tim with a bucket of water system, causing the child to catch a cold that leads to his death. That, and a moment where Scrooge is in risk of relapsing into his old ways, make this a interpretation worth watching, a long as you keep in mind that it ‘s an decorate adaptation rather than a straight translation .
13. Robert Zemeckis’ A Christmas Carol
The furthest from the 1901 silent film both in clock and technology is Robert Zemeckis’ 2009 computer-animated version that starred Jim Carrey as Scrooge and each of the Christmas Spirits. The huge budget for this production was more than made up for by a few weeks atop the box agency charts, but the film did n’t quite turn into a worldwide blockbuster the way Disney had credibly intended. personally, I blame the Uncanny Valley effect for this film not being bigger than it was .
The character design and effects study are well-crafted and absolutely suited for Dickens ‘ exploration of the supernatural, but much like Zemeckis ‘ former use of this animation engineering in the 2004 movie The Polar Express, there ‘s fair something unsettling about the characters ‘ faces. however, these visuals work spectacularly well when applied to Scrooge ‘s visits across clock and space, specifically during Fezziwig ‘s antic Christmas party. And while Scrooge ‘s redemption fit benefits from Carrey ‘s detail stigmatize of extraordinary act, the fact that Carrey besides plays the part of all three Spirits limits their crop slightly. This is a worthwhile and fairly traditional adaptation despite the modern engineering, but if the Uncanny Valley consequence bothers you, look elsewhere .
12. FX’s ‘A Christmas Carol’
Image via Robert Viglasky/FX
I appreciate the exploration of precisely how dark a nineteenth century Scrooge ( Guy Pearce ) could have gone ; I actually applaud this interpretation for bringing some inexperience and grit to a story that ’ second become slightly sanitized in popular adaptations to date. For the bulge of the tattle, A Christmas Carol should scare the ember out of both commodity and extraordinary people the global over, because it ’ s an exposé of all of us at our worst moments, a review of world and how we behave on every day of the year except for those where holiday traditions demand we actually be civil for once. But while Knight pays court to both authoritative moments in the 176-year-old narrative and adaptations gone by, equally well as adding his own apt twists and turns to the narrative, neither Scrooge nor the audience is given a prospect to breathe free and observe gleefully. That ’ s a miss opportunity that robs the story of its redemptive power .
Knight wants his niggard to be both a mustache-twirling villain who uses facts and figures to make each and every cold, calculated decisiveness careless of the human or emotional costs involved, but he besides wants us to empathize with Scrooge well before there ’ randomness any hint of repentance. That idea in and of itself international relations and security network ’ thymine new ; we ’ ve seen Scrooge ’ south troubled boyhood days left alone over the vacation unwrap at a board school, or suffering in silence at the end of his sister or the grievous dissolution of his romantic relationships. That used to be enough to humanize Scrooge. immediately, Knight has to take that estimate to extremes. Abuse of all kinds afflicts the young Scrooge in fair about every way conceivable. The adult Scrooge uses this reality as an apology to harden his heart and dainty everyone around him with contempt and condescension, and it ’ s only when he can voice these past pains against him that he ’ mho able to move forward .
That would be fine if Scrooge was offered the time and opportunity to bounce spinal column in the other commission. Some of the best moments from other adaptations of A Christmas Carol come while watching Scrooge work like a blithe male child once more, despite his advanced senesce and ill-famed repute as a barbarous miser and niggard. Pearce ’ mho Scrooge is robbed of this. His character is taken indeed far into the darkness that basic empathy and worry for another human being is a close as he can get to joy, happiness, and reveling in the Christmas spirit. This Scrooge is not hollering from top-floor windows for Christmas goose or dancing around his bedroom with a song in his heart and a spring in his pace, and that ’ s a dishonor, because Pearce has the endowment to let loose but the gravitational pull of this version ’ sulfur dark subject substantial just wouldn ’ t let him go .
FX ’ s A Christmas Carol surely brings something new to the tried-and-true floor and it ’ s worth a watch for that alone. It plumbs the depths of iniquity to the detail that even the normally buoyant Cratchit Family is dragged down with Scrooge. But without a redemptive arise to counterbalance all that dark, A Christmas Carol misses out on the mean of the fib and the greater entail of the Christmas season .
11. Mickey’s Christmas Carol
Read more: Apollo for Reddit
Image via Disney
If you ‘re looking for a great introductory interpretation of A Christmas Carol to show the kids, then look no further than this special. not only does it have a fairly short runtime of about 25 minutes, it besides features some of Disney ‘s most recognizable toons. And if you ‘re looking for a modern connection to this 1983 special, look no further than current headman creative officer of Pixar Animation Studios, Walt Disney Animation Studios, and DisneyToon Studios, John Lasseter, who ‘s crew listing on this unretentive notes his “ creative talent. ”
originally named after Ebenezer Scrooge himself, none other than Scrooge McDuck plays the nefarious role in this version ; could you have it any other direction ? And while the assorted Disney creations that pop up throughout the report are ampere delightful as you ‘d expect, my very favorite one is the cartoon that ends up being the Spirit of Christmas Yet to Come. I wo n’t spoil the unwrap here, but it should bring a smile to Disney fans young and erstwhile .
10. A Flintstone’s Christmas Carol
now we can start getting into the dangerous stuff ! While a Flintstones adaptation might not spring to mind when thinking about A Christmas Carol adaptations, this 1994 especial is actually quite good. It ‘s a must-watch for fans of Bedrock ‘s first gear family, and a big way for the unharmed family to enjoy Dickens ‘ Christmas fib .
much like Mister Magoo ‘s version, this especial sees the town of Bedrock putting on A Christmas Carol production with Fred Flintstone playing Scrooge, of class. Unlike that version, however, the Flintstones writers expertly play on the franchise characters ‘ traits – such as Slate stating he ‘d make a better Scrooge than Fred, which Barney agrees with – and weave in modern temper – like last-minute Christmas shoppers running over a plaza Santa – in order to add a meta layer or two. far deepening this narrative, Fred ‘s asterisk status starts to go to his head as the dally goes on, and it ‘s up to his syndicate, friends, and companion cast members to bring his self back down to Earth. It not lone entertains adults and children alike, it manages to pull of Dickens ‘ Christmas classical and reforms Fred ‘s selfishness at the lapp meter. Yabba-dabba-doo !
9. A Christmas Carol (1999)
He ‘s played Professor X, Captain Jean-Luc Picard, and even King Richard, but taking on the character of Ebenezer Scrooge in this television limited allowed Patrick Stewart to cross the iconic character off his disturbance list. Granted, the television receiver movie came after a guide of Stewart ‘s theatrical performance performances of A Christmas Carol on Broadway and in London. Despite the dignity he brings to the character, this is n’t the best of the live-action adaptations ( though it did earn a primetime Emmy nominating speech ), flush if it ‘s far from the worst .
There are some elements of Dickens ‘ fib that are rekindled in this version that others seem to have forgotten, such as the generator ‘s metaphorical chew over over the phrase “ dead as a doornail ” or the sojourn to far-flung Christmas revelers at a distant beacon and a ship at sea during the Ghost of Christmas Present ‘s lesson. But Stewart ‘s Scrooge finally just classify of wanders through his scenes, flush though the supporting casting is firm. It makes his redemptive setting towards the movie ‘s end a fiddling less impactful, though watching it good for Stewart ‘s bizarre laugh as Scrooge learns to take himself less badly about makes it all worthwhile .
8. A Christmas Carol (1997)
If your kids have graduated past the stagecoach of Flintstones and Mickey Mouse but still prefer to view their Dickens ‘ stories in animize fashion, then this 1997 version makes a great adjacent step. It features the fantastic Tim Curry in the spokesperson character of Scrooge, which not only gives him a chance to bring his usual nefarious flair to the character but besides lets him experience some redemption ( for once ). And although this is a melodious adaptation, it ‘s one of the rare ones that actually manages to conjure up some emotion through the songs themselves .
This translation has a few departures from Dickens ‘ story, like Scrooge ‘s cartoonish bulldog ( named Debit ) or Scrooge engaging in an epic poem song battle against a tavern full moon of well-wishers calling for “ Random Acts of Kindness. ” The songs feel much more organic than other musical versions, possibly owing to the animated nature of the movie, but two in particular are very effective. One happen during the lessons of Christmas Past when a younger Scrooge and his fiancee Belle are trying to sort out their relationship and “ cross this bridge together ” ; it ‘s appropriately heart-breaking. Another occur during Scrooge ‘s redemptive scenery in which Curry gets to express his character ‘s Christmas spirit through a birdcall. That ‘s the way you do musicals, and this is the way you do an inspire Christmas Carol .
7. The Muppet Christmas Carol
Image via Disney
We ‘ll pretty much be splitting hairs from here on out, because these adaptations of A Christmas Carol appeal to different folks for different reasons. In this particular exemplify, die-hard Muppets fans would probably like to see this version a little higher on the list, but I ‘m not as adoring of the Jim Henson creations as most are. That aside, my only gripe with this interpretation has nothing to do with the fabulously amusing Muppets, but preferably with their very human Scrooge .
You ‘d think that two time Oscar-winner Michael Caine would be able to pull off Scrooge in his sleep, but I was surprised to find that he seemed to walk through the role at times. possibly it was the humorous, fourth-wall-breaking expressive style of the Muppets that threw him off, or possibly he felt like he was playing second tinker to a frame of fishy puppets. The Muppets folks surely know how to punch up the temper in scenes that seem tailor-made for their post of hijinks ; can you very have a better Fezziwig than Fozzie-wig ? But ultimately it ‘s Caine ‘s sometimes-flat performance as Scrooge – even during his sing-song redemptive moments – that keeps this version from climbing higher on the list .
6. A Christmas Carol (1984)
It ‘s at this compass point in the list where we start to talk about the authoritative adaptations of A Christmas Carol and the names associated with them. I hate to say it, but if person mentioned George C. Scott, I ‘d know his name from this 1984 interpretation of the vacation narrative before I ‘d recall his Oscar-winning championship function in director Franklin J. Schaffner’s biopic Patton, or his part in Stanley Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove. There ‘s actually quite a sting of starpower in this television movie, including Oscar-nominated Frank Finlay, Emmy-winner David Warner, and Emmy-nominated actor, the late Roger Reese .
With big-name stars on the small screen, this adaptation surely feels more like a feature-length period play. The pace is slowed down to allow viewers to soak into the experience and the actors appear to do the lapp. interestingly, the religious iconography is more overt in this version than others, for exercise, when Jacob Marley ‘s ghost appears from merely beneath a painting of “ The final Supper. ” Scott ‘s redemptive scenes at the movie ‘s end is one of the best out of all the adaptations, a moment that led to his nominating speech for a Primetime Emmy for the character. If you have n’t seen this adaptation, decidedly add it to your tilt .
Image via Paramount Pictures
well the best non-traditional adaptation of A Christmas Carol, Richard Donner’s 1988 drollery Scrooged is a will to barely how dateless Dickens ‘ narrative is. Set in the hyper-violent and profit-obsessed entertainment world of the 1980s, Bill Murray plays Frank Cross, a television receiver network executive who ‘s under the accelerator to bring in huge numbers for the groove ‘s approaching Christmas particular. What follows is an exploration that goes behind the scenes of a “ traditional ” television receiver adaptation of the report, and more importantly, a quality examination of Cross as a contemporary Scrooge .
You can tell proper off the bat whether the trade name of humor seen in Scrooged is your cup of chew over cider or not, as it opens with a promotional patch showing arm assailants shooting up Santa ‘s workshop, only to see Lee Majors save the day. That kind of humor continues as Cross is visited by three Christmas spirits, causing him to hallucinate wildly and put production of his Christmas particular in hazard. It ‘s worth noting that this is a identical loosen adaptation of the fib, but the emotion between Cross and his bleeding-heart true love Claire ( Karen Allen ) is a great example of how adaptations can trump translations. And using a classical fib of redemption as the model for a sarcasm of mod culture ‘s hope to embrace the irreclaimable is just besides good to pass up. Make surely Scrooged is on your watchlist if you want something other than the traditional adaptation .
4. A Christmas Carol (1971)
Our last animated adaptation of A Christmas Carol came as a surprise to me. It ‘s one of the few versions I had n’t seen ahead and is now one of my favorites. I love the traditional hand-drawn animation that brings the characters to life in a realistic portrayal, though occasionally transitioning to sketchy or dream-like styles. It ‘s a beautiful rendition of Dickens ‘ narrative that looks like authoritative priggish earned run average illustrations come to liveliness. It besides helps that Alastair Sim reprises his function of Scrooge, a function he made celebrated 20 years earlier .
This adaptation, a brisk 25-minute one at that, is both charming and skittish, providing an experience that ‘s the adjacent best thing to reading the narrative itself. It does something I have rarely seen in live-action adaptations : While Scrooge bears witness to the lessons of the Christmas Spirits, his mind occasionally flashes back to a moment in his late past when he could have, and should have, been kind. It ‘s done with a deft touch and shows attention to detail, much like the character design that draws directly from Dickens ‘ own poetic descriptions. While the ending feels a spot rush and Scrooge ‘s redemption falls short of some of the live-action performances on this tilt, this one ‘s a hidden gem .
3. Scrooge (1935)
now we ‘re solidly into the classics. Again, your mileage may vary here, but for my money and time, these three are the best traditional adaptations of A Christmas Carol that presently exist. The oldest of them is this 1935 version starring Sir Seymour Hicks in the character of Scrooge. It ‘s the rare interpretation that actually includes Dickens ‘ playful foreword at the introduction of the fib, but adds its own clever embellishments along the way. One such embellishment is what made this adaptation therefore endearing to me .
Though Scrooge is a very rich homo in all versions of the narrative, this relation goes a tone further in elucidating that fact. Yes, there ‘s the portrayal of Scrooge as thinking himself above the common world, specially street urchins and those who owe him money, but conductor Henry Edwards goes farther. While late adaptations stick to this unilateral portrayal of Scrooge, this version takes time to show the royal syndicate and their many, many guests and servants celebrating Christmas with a lavish feed. The luxury, refinement, and even liquid body substance of this one scene is juxtaposed against Scrooge ‘s own meager feast ( by his own design ) in a blue chop theater in which he sups entirely. Bookending Scrooge ‘s scenes in this manner is a brainy way to show him as a man adrift in society. That alone makes this Scrooge one of my favorite adaptations, but the fact that it feels like the most earnest and least “ produced ” surely does n’t hurt. The alone downside is that Hicks feels a act besides old to truly let himself get carried away during the redemptive picture. regardless, this interpretation is decidedly worth your meter .
‘Senior Year ‘ Trailer Reveals Rebel Wilson Going Back to High School
About The generator
( 9255 Articles Published )
Senior Editor – Games | Former Editor of Animation, Streaming Content |Author of “ The Science of Breaking Bad ” from MIT Press | Twitch Affiliate : twitch.tv/drclawmd | Co-host of the Saturday Mourning Cartoons podcast | Community director for Ironface Studios | Former science freelancer writer for Nerdist.com |
From Dave Trumbore
Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up for Collider ‘s newsletter for exclusive news, features, streaming recommendations and more
Click here to subscribe